As Meinong says so well, we confuse identity with agreement.
Then, according to Meinong, we have to distinguish three elements which are necessarily combined in constituting the one thought.
Meinong insists upon an existential judgment, a judgment that the object valued is real, as essential to value.
There is another important condition to which Hume calls attention and which is interpreted by his clever disciple Meinong.
Meinong does not regard this as a contradiction, but I fail to see that it is not one.
